![]() The Glo HD weighs 180 grams and measure 157 x 115 x 9.2mm Size – The size and weight difference is fairly significant: The Aura H2O weighs 233 grams and measures 179 x 129 x 9.7mm. Frontlights are known to vary from unit to unit so take it with a grain of salt. Both show a little bit of shadows at the bottom of the screen but the light is otherwise evenly distributed. The H2O’s frontlight is yellow in tone, and the Glo HD’s is more of a whitish color, with a hint of blue. Text basically looks the exact same on both screens the pixel density is so similar that it’s hard to see any difference.įrontlight – Both have frontlights with a similar range of brightness settings, but the color of the frontlights is very different. Both use E Ink Carta screens with infrared touch. Screen – The Aura H2O has a 6.8-inch screen with a 1430 x 1080 resolution (265 ppi) and the Glo HD has a 6-inch screen with a resolution of 1448 x 1072 resolution (300 ppi). The Glo HD only has a web browser listed, whereas the Aura H2O adds a sketchpad and a few games.īelow is a list of the main differences between the Glo HD and Aura H2O. Everything seems the exact same between them with this software version except the Beta Features. It’s worth noting that both devices are running firmware version 3.15.0 for this comparison review. The Glo HD retails for $129 and the Aura H2O is $179, so there’s a pretty big difference in price too. The main difference between them is the Aura H2O has a larger screen, a microSD card slot, and it’s waterproof. The same languages and formats are supported, they have the same font choices and font sizes, the same infrared touchscreen, and so on. Both have 4GB of onboard storage space, Wi-Fi, a micro USB port, and the same estimated battery life of up to 2 months (1 month is more realistic).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |